Log in

No account? Create an account
Blokkal 0.1.0 Released - KLiveJournal & Blokkal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
KLiveJournal & Blokkal

[ website | Blokkal - an Extendable Blogging Client ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Blokkal 0.1.0 Released [Mar. 3rd, 2008|11:39 am]
KLiveJournal & Blokkal


[mood |accomplished]

This releases fixes various bugs, most notably one in the utf8 handling in the LiveJournal plugin. The entry browser has received a facelift and suport for Blogger/GData has been added. The preview feature has been rearanged a bit. The source code is available here.

[User Picture]From: a1ast0r
2008-12-06 12:46 pm (UTC)

Can't compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux

I try to compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux and I get the following error:

In file included from /share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.cpp:21:
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc: In member function ‘virtual int CalendarTabPage::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)’:
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc:216: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct QDate’
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.h:25: error: forward declaration of ‘struct QDate’
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc:216: error: while initiate 1st argument ‘void CalendarTabPage::slotDateChanged(QDate)’
make[2]: *** [src/core/blokkalbevp/CMakeFiles/blokkal_bevp.dir/browsetabpages.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/core/blokkalbevp/CMakeFiles/blokkal_bevp.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

I add string
#include <QDate>
to src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.h and its compiled successfully.
My system:
QT 4.4.3
KDE 4.1.3
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: orvio
2009-01-02 04:37 pm (UTC)

Re: Can't compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux

Thanks for the heads up. Seems like the output of the Qt meta object compiler has changed. While investigating I found a linker problem with the GData protocol plugin as well. I've fixed both and committed the changes to the svn repository in sourceforge.net.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: (Anonymous)
2009-02-09 11:33 pm (UTC)

How is this coming along?

Last release 0.1.0 was nearly a year ago, has this project been dropped? :(

I don't code so I cannot help, but I would love to find a nice blogging app for KDE and I was hoping this was it. There are no Debian packages available that I can find in the default repos, so when I wend to download this i saw the old date. I hope that it isn't dead!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: orvio
2009-02-10 05:29 pm (UTC)

Re: How is this coming along?

The project isn't dead. It's just that all the easy stuff is implemented and all the shiny stuff requires a lot of work, which in turn requires a lot time that I currently don't have. However, there are some fixes in the subversion repository at sourceforge.net.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)