|Blokkal 0.1.0 Released
||[Mar. 3rd, 2008|11:39 am]
KLiveJournal & Blokkal
This releases fixes various bugs, most notably one in the utf8 handling in the LiveJournal plugin. The entry browser has received a facelift and suport for Blogger/GData has been added. The preview feature has been rearanged a bit. The source code is available here.
2008-12-06 12:46 pm (UTC)
Can't compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux
I try to compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux and I get the following error:
In file included from /share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.cpp:21:
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc: In member function ‘virtual int CalendarTabPage::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**)’:
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc:216: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘struct QDate’
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.h:25: error: forward declaration of ‘struct QDate’
/share/src/Blokkal-0.1.0/src/core/blokkalbevp/browsetabpages.moc:216: error: while initiate 1st argument ‘void CalendarTabPage::slotDateChanged(QDate)’
make: *** [src/core/blokkalbevp/CMakeFiles/blokkal_bevp.dir/browsetabpages.o] Error 1
make: *** [src/core/blokkalbevp/CMakeFiles/blokkal_bevp.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
I add string
and its compiled successfully.
2009-01-02 04:37 pm (UTC)
Re: Can't compile Blokkal 0.1.0 under ArchLinux
Thanks for the heads up. Seems like the output of the Qt meta object compiler has changed. While investigating I found a linker problem with the GData protocol plugin as well. I've fixed both and committed the changes to the svn repository in sourceforge.net.
2009-02-09 11:33 pm (UTC)
How is this coming along?
Last release 0.1.0 was nearly a year ago, has this project been dropped? :(
I don't code so I cannot help, but I would love to find a nice blogging app for KDE and I was hoping this was it. There are no Debian packages available that I can find in the default repos, so when I wend to download this i saw the old date. I hope that it isn't dead!
2009-02-10 05:29 pm (UTC)
Re: How is this coming along?
The project isn't dead. It's just that all the easy stuff is implemented and all the shiny stuff requires a lot of work, which in turn requires a lot time that I currently don't have. However, there are some fixes in the subversion repository at sourceforge.net.